Related to the selection phase of education officials in 2016 in Minh Hoa district, Dinh Xuan Fresh candidates have sent letters to the press agency "elements" Recruitment Council has dishonest, suppress, lack transparency makes his interests are affected.
Mr. Dinh Xuan Tuoi who are doing the "elements" board of examiners education officials Minh Hoa district in 2016 with the "dishonest"
Fresh Dinh Xuan Anh (born 1984), resident of Xuan Hoa - Minh Hoa district (Quang Binh) has graduated with a Bachelor of Fine Arts Pedagogy - University of Arts - University of Hue in 2014. On 14.4.2016, he fresh applicants attend the admissions officer Minh Hoa district Education career in 2016 in the form of interviews.
To Date 05/23/2016, Minh Hoa District People's Committee has listed the scores announcement No. 106 / TB-Committee publicize the results of the test scores of contestants. Accordingly, spot examinations and tests (in the form of still meeting) of the candidate Dinh Xuan Fresh 47.5 points, below the floor is 50 points points to pass.
Not content with the results and said that the Council had recruited lack of objectivity, so the announcement of lower real point of the test interview. Specifically, candidates Dinh Xuan Fresh affirmed Recruitment Council has conducted recordings contest of candidates interviewed, after the end of the interview held council of examination papers, his interview (wrong with law) and lowered his points down compared with the initial results was 57 points.
Talking to us, he proved Urgent Fresh: "After the end of the interview and test results received 47.5 points interview, I had to meet Mr Cao Van Water - Hoa Tien Secondary School Principals , is one of the Council members, admission and who live scoring my interview. Water master mouth confirmed my initial score is 57 points rather than 47.5 as of listing ".
Recruitment Council Minh Hoa district really transparency in the selection process? Dinh Xuan of Fresh contestants can actually suppress, bewitched him from "a non-matriculated" as he reflected? To broad public opinion, PV had direct contact with Mr. Cao Van Countries to hold additional information about the incident.
Talking to Reporter by phone, Mr. Cao Van Water has confirmed that he is the one who directly scoring candidates interviewed Dinh Xuan Fresh. At the same time, he also dared to assert that the precise location of his original Fresh 57 points rather than 47.5 points as the points listed. And his score 47.5 Fresh publicly listed by the Council is organizing admission dots and change the outcome. "The Council has held dots back but I have no participation".
The reply shall assert no work of examination papers of the candidate's Fresh Dinh Xuan Tran Thi Kim Soa - Vice Chairman of Minh Hoa district
To reclaim their legitimate rights, he wrote a complaint Fresh DPC Minh Hoa and Recruitment Council. To date 24/6, Recruitment Council has written 103 / HDXT answer to his complaint Fresh. However, the most confusing thing in the incident is in the written reply of the Council of admission by Ms. Tran Thi Kim Soa - PCT Minh Hoa District People's Committee, as well as Chairman of the Selection Board confirmed that: "... After the end of the interview, the Selection Committee will not hold back the judging of contestants. Scores of his examinations and tests 47.5 points points as listed in Notice No. 106 / TB-Committee dated 05/23/2016 of Minh Hoa District People's Committee "(???).
Together in Recruitment Council, but Mr. Cao Van Water - Councillor and who live scoring candidates interviewed for Fresh Dinh Xuan affirmed his point is 57 points and put back. But she chairman Tran Thi Kim Soa again confirmed in dispatch point 47.5 and without the organization put back. So where is the truth of the incident? Recruitment Council has actually openly, transparently and with organizations of contestants remarking Dinh Xuan fresh as his affirmation Water? And if the examination papers, interviews of the Council have the right to the Circular and the law?
No comments: