A

Slider

" });
Theme images by kelvinjay. Powered by Blogger.

POLITICS

OPINION

ENTERTAINMENT

TECH

SCIENCE

HEALTH

TRAVEL

» » Why Samsung is not equipped with Quick Charge 3.0 for Galaxy S7?

Samsung Galaxy duo S7 and S7 Edge is equipped with a lot of advanced technology, however, a single deficiencies it is quick charge technology Quick Charge 3.0 with remarkable improvements in speed charging. In version Exynos 8890, we recorded only equipped Samsung Galaxy Quick Charge 2.0 S7 / S7 Edge and questions about the Snapdragon 820 will use Quick Charge 3.0. However, in fact, versions, most advanced processor of Qualcomm did not use this fast charging technology.


QUICK QUICK CHARGER CHARGE TECHNOLOGY 3.0
Quick Charge 3.0 technology is the successor by Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0 development. This technology is integrated on the chip Snapdagon 820, 620, 618, 617 and 430, is likely to have added the new chips such as 435 or 652. This technology also has been on a number of leading phones G5 as LG, HTC One A9, Leeco Le Max Pro and Xiaomi Mi 5.

Why Samsung is not equipped with Quick Charge 3.0 for Galaxy S7?

Quick Charge charging rate of 3.0 effective than version 2.0 to 38%, more than 2 times compared with 1.0 and 4 times higher than conventional chargers. In theory, the new charging technology will help smartphones reach 80% battery capacity in just 35 minutes. Faster charging only hip, Quick Charge 3.0 is also very energy-efficient technologies by applying INOV (Intelligent Negotiation for Optimum Voltage). This technology allows the device may require proper power needed. For example, Quick Charge 2.0 just like the energy levels of 5V, 9V, 10V or 20V, while the Quick Charge 3.0 subdivide these levels down to 200mV, which lasted from 3.6 to 20V, making crab saving charger more battery.

Why Samsung is not equipped with Quick Charge 3.0 for Galaxy S7?

In addition, Quick Charge 3.0 also aims to support the common connectivity standard USB Type-present as A, microUSB, USB-Type C and is backwards compatible with older standards such as fast charging and Quick Charge Quick Charge 2.0 1.0 and most current USB charger. However, for the highest efficiency and the charging equipment must also be supported. Qualcomm hopes equipment systems, accessories, support Quick Charge 3.0 will be replicated in the future.

According to representatives of Qualcomm Quick Charge 3.0 works perfectly with the equipment owned large battery capacity and the ability to protect the battery technology is very impressive.

WHY SAMSUNG NOT EQUIPPED FOR GALAXY 3.0 QUICK CHARGE S7, S7 EDGE?
In the event introduced 820 Snapdragon processor by Qualcomm organization, a question has been raised for its representative was quite hot the Xiaomi Mi 5 charging and this product is also equipped with Quick Charge 3.0 technology .

Why Samsung is not equipped with Quick Charge 3.0 for Galaxy S7?

Even the 820 Snapdragon, Samsung is also not equipped with Quick Charge 3.0. Photo: Android Central

Qualcomm's representative said that the device is very hot due to other causes, not merely by the Quick Charge 3.0. This position also for Vietnam the media holding device testing technology is being charged by this and indeed it was not hot. However, a small wonder that arises equipment is charged to 100% and with protection mechanisms, the limited line has been activated, the temperature had dropped. Equipment is only heated up during charging only.

Actual test, the Samsung Galaxy S7 pretty hot even use Quick Charge 2.0, note, the machine is idle, not launch any application. Therefore, the big question the heat, damage to the battery when charging up the Samsung is not equipped with Quick Charge 3.0 for new product duo. Faced with this question, representing Qualcomm said it depends on the Samsung and can, Galaxy S7 is developed before its quick charging technology is launched. This can be seen as a reasonable explanation for this.

More likely to come, Galaxy Note 6 will be equipped with Quick Charge 3.0, suitable for larger battery capacity and energy efficiency better.


No comments: